Sizewell C granted Nuclear Site Licence

It's just the second site licence the Office for Nuclear Regulation has granted in more than 35 years

Author: Sian RochePublished 8th May 2024

Plans to build a nuclear power station on the Suffolk coast have taken a step forward - it's now been awarded a Nuclear Site Licence.

It is the first time that the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has granted a site licence since issuing one to Hinkley Point C in Somerset in 2012.

The licence means Sizewell C will have a legal responsibility to comply with a range of health and safety and nuclear security regulations.

Although the granting of a site licence is a significant step, it does not permit the start of nuclear-related construction on the site.

It does, however, give bosses at Sizewell C the opportunity to request ONR permission for starting nuclear-related construction.

"Fundamental"

Mark Foy, ONR’s Chief Nuclear Inspector and Chief Executive said: “I am pleased to confirm that following extensive engagement and review by the ONR team, our assessment of the Sizewell C application is complete and a nuclear site licence has been granted.

“The licensing process is fundamental in confirming that operators of a nuclear site are ready and able to meet their obligations under the nuclear site licence, to protect their workforce and the public.

“The granting of this licence is one step in ONR’s process, allowing us to provide greater regulatory oversight, advice and challenge to the licensee as they progress their plans.

“We will continue working with Sizewell C to ensure that the highest levels of safety and security are met.”

"Appalled"

The decision's angered campaigners at Stop Sizewell C, who oppose plans for the plant, citing environmental and safety concerns, with a spokesperson saying: "Stop Sizewell C is appalled that a nuclear site licence has been issued when matters critical to the future safety of the site remain unresolved.

"There isn't even a final design of the sea defences, which will be necessary to keep this vulnerable site safe for the next century and a half, at the very least. This seems to us like kicking the can down the road, on the assumption that some future generation will be able to clear up the mess."